Blue Moon City

I've played Blue Moon City about six times in the last two weeks. I do enjoy the game (obviously), but I do have a concern about player order. It seems to me that the first player has a significant advantage over the last player. The first player will always have as many moves as the last player, and possibly more. Given the nature of the game-ending conditions, this seems like A BAD THING. Also, the first spaces on the obelisk are cheaper, meaning the first player has the opportunity to snap them up first at a better price -- all else being equal.In my six games, the first player didn't always win, but I'd say it happened a majority of the time, with the last player having the worst odds. If players know about this issue, then they can possibly self-balance by not cooperating with the first player as much, but this tactic presumes that there *is* a balance issue, and one that's not at all obvious. You'd think Knizia would have addressed it somehow. We thought it might be interesting to offer more cards to start the game the further you were from start. Perhaps. 8 for the start player, 9 for second, 10 for third, and 11 for fourth. This idea is not tested, however.